Saturday, 19 April 2025

BBC Radio Ulster Morning Service


BBC Radio Ulster

Morning Service - A Service for Advent

"Waiting for Christ"

Rev R D Drysdale

CLICK HERE FOR RECORDING


Music: 

America            Simon & Garfunkel

I am a Rock      Simon & Garfunkel

Hymn: "Lord Thy Word Abideth"

Hymn: "Fairest Lord Jesus"



ADVENT

The First Sunday in Advent. Hard to believe, isn't it? Christmas almost on top of us again, and all those gifts still to be bought, and cards posted, all those forgotten friends and relatives. Still, like it or dread it, the Advent season is with us again.

Advent, without putting too nice a definition on it, means coming. Though what, in fact, we're going to do this morning is to think more about going or seeking to be exact. You'll see what I mean in a moment.

We begin with a poem. It's “The Journey of the Magi” by T.S. Eliot, and that should give you a clue to the overall theme of this first reflection on Advent. The poem describes the Magi, the Three Wise Men, the Kings of the Orient, whatever you like to call them, the Magi, setting out in pursuit of a star.

“A cold coming we had of it, just the worst time of the year for a journey, and such a long journey, the ways deep and the weather sharp, the very dead of winter, and the camels galled, sore-footed, refractory, lying down in the melting snow. There were times we regretted the summer palaces on slopes, the terraces, and the silken girls bringing sherbet, then the camel men cursing and grumbling and running away and wanting their liquor and women, and the night fires going out, the lack of shelter, and the cities hostile, and the towns unfriendly, and the villages dirty and charging high prices. 

A hard time we had of it.

At the end we preferred to travel all night, sleeping in snatches, with the voices singing in our ears, saying that this was all folly. Then at dawn we came down to a temperate valley, wet below the snow line, smelling of vegetation, with a running stream and a water mill beating the darkness, and three trees in the low sky, and an old white horse galloped away in the meadow. Then we came to a tavern with vine leaves over the lintel, six hands at an open door, dicing for pieces of silver and feet kicking the empty wineskins.

But there was no information, and so we continued and arrived at evening, not a moment too soon finding the place. It was, you may say, satisfactory.” 

That sets the scene.

The Magi set out in search of a king, and I like the port's description of that journey. There's a realism about it. The Magi and their search are earthed in this world.

The poem removes them from the clinical and rather ethereal image of our tinselled and fairy-lit Christmases. You know what I mean. Characters that, well, really, it's a bit hard to believe in.Eliot gives them somehow human faces, human feelings, and at the end of it all, as we'll see when we return to the poem, the object of their search leaves them shattered, unsettled, and discontent. The world doesn't simply become a lovely place because of their encounter with the Christ child. The poem isn't a happy ever after story, but more about that later.
Before we go any further, let's get something out of the way at the outset. Some people regard these nativity stories, and especially this part about the Magi, as rather fanciful legends, a slice of biblical folklore, a bit of romantic indulgence on the part of the gospel writers. Well, certainly it seems to me that it is the meaning of the symbolism of these stories that matters most, rather than haggling over their historical and factual accuracy, but there's no good reason why the Magi should be assigned only to the realm of poetic construction.

Magi, we know, were members of a tribe of the Medes, who became a priestly caste in Persia. Their religious understanding of life was based on astrology. They were, in this sense, wise men, observers of the stars.

So, there's nothing really all that unusual about the presence of the Magi in Jerusalem. They're there because they've come from the east, following the appearance of a strange star in the sky. It was a common enough feature in the events with the appearance of new stars in the heavens, and there's certainly nothing all that unusual about travellers using the stars to guide them.

Mind you, I don't want to make too much of this, for it seems to me that even if we could produce birth certificates for all the Magi, that doesn't mean they would have any real significance for us today. Here, history and interpretation, fact and symbol, are interwoven in the Christmas story. We have to, as it were, accept the whole package.

So, let's return now to the real issue, the meaning of the Magi for us in this biblical story. And incidentally, St. Matthew doesn't tell us how many there were, nor does he give us any clue about their names. For me, the Magi symbolise an essential element, not only in Advent, but in the whole of religious experience.

They symbolise a search, man on a journey, travelling people seeking a king. It's a theme, strangely enough, that's captured for me in a piece of music that I realise isn't overtly religious, but I think it is intensely spiritual in its own way. It's Simon and Garfunkel's song, “America.” In spite of the title, it's not a bit jingoistic, but it is rather a haunting expression of the strange, wistful, adventurous spirit of two young people on the road, hitchhikers and greyhound bus riders, out in search of life. A boy and girl seeking the meaning and identity of where they are and where they're going. So, as the song says, they walked off to look for America.

It may seem to you an awkward step, but strangely enough, that song takes me back to someone else in search of a country, the Old Testament patriarch Abraham, who walked off to look for the Promised Land, his America. And in a sense, the journey of the Magi really began back there, when this old man, with nothing but the conviction of a call and a vision, left his future and secure life in Ur of the Chaldeans and set out into the unknown, believing that somewhere at the end of it all would be God's promise of a new order. Tough luck if he was wrong, but there was only one way to find out, and that was to get up and go.

We read about it in Genesis Chapter 12 and in the New Testament letter to the Hebrews, Chapter 11. 

“Now the Lord said to Abraham, Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you, and I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who curses you I will curse, and by you all the families of the earth will bless themselves.

So, Abraham went as the Lord had told him, and Lot went with him. Abraham was 75 years old when he'd departed from Haran, and Abram took Sarah his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all the possessions which they had gathered, and the persons that they had gotten in Harran, and they set forth to go to the land of Canaan. By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place which he was to receive as an inheritance, and he went out not knowing where he was to go.

By faith he sojourned in the Land of Promise, as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise. For he looked forward to the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God.” 

Clearly the Bible, and especially that New Testament passage, regard this search of Abraham's as a demonstration of faith, and of course that catches the spirit of Christianity exactly.

Christian discipleship is often understood as a pilgrimage, a journey in search of the kingly rule of God, and what the Gospels frequently refer to as the kingdom of heaven. And such a discipleship is based on faith. Why faith? Well, I suppose the nature of the journey demands faith, leaving behind old securities, old views, and setting out like Abraham, not knowing where he was to go.

Come, follow me, said Jesus to the astonished fishermen. That's all. No guarantees, no teasing promises, just a call containing a vision.

A journey like that needs faith, and that means decision, commitment, involvement. We don't just happen upon it. We don't just find ourselves caught up in the search unless we do something about it.

Take the first step, get up and go. To get back to the Magi again, it's conjecture I know, but presumably there must have been some point at which they decided to set out and follow this mysterious star. For all they knew, they could be totally mistaken, but there was only one way to find out, on the road. And so, they walked off to look for a king. 

John Mackay, in his classic little book, “A Preface to Christian Theology,” written in the 1940s but still remarkably modern, makes this point very well through his description of two basic attitudes to life, which he illustrates through the symbols of the balcony and the road. 

“By the balcony, I do not mean the gallery of a church or theatre. I mean that little platform in wood or stone that protrudes from the upper window of a Spanish home. There the family may gather of an evening to gaze spectator-wise upon the street beneath, or at the sunset, or the stars beyond. The balcony thus conceived is the classical standpoint, and so the symbol of the perfect spectator, for whom life and the universe are permanent objects of study and contemplation.

It is not necessary that the balcony, in the sense in which it is here used, be static. A man may live a permanently balconised existence, even though the physical part of him have the ubiquity of the globetrotter. For the balcony means an immobility of soul that may perfectly coexist with a mobile peripatetic body.

By the road, I mean the place where life is tensely lived, where thought has its birth in conflict and concern, where choices are made, and decisions are carried out. It is the place of action, of pilgrimage, of crusade, where concern is never absent from the wayfarer's heart. On the road, a goal is sought, dangers are faced, life is poured out.

Let us beware, however, lest we interpret the road in a purely physical sense. Many have passed their lives on the road who never journeyed very far from their desk or their pulpit, from a hospital clinic or a carpenter's bench. Others serve upon the road who only stand and wait, for the road, like the balcony, is a state of the soul.”

That's a biting illustration, isn't it? Seeking means commitment. We can't engage in the search for the Christ until we come down from the balcony onto the road, until we're ready to leave the spectator role and get involved in all the excitement, disappointments, hurt, and turmoil of participants. And that means the decision of faith, to risk one's life, staking it upon a vision, a star, and following where it leads, and with no built-in insurance clauses against error and accident.

It's not for nothing that the earliest Christian disciples were simply referred to as the people of the way. The terrible thing is, it's so easy for us to seek God, even with the Word, sacraments, and fellowship of the Church, and our own personal devotion in the middle of it all, to seek God, and yet never leave the balcony. Nothing's really threatened, nothing changes.

Faith, you see, isn't involved. Søren Kierkegaard, a 19th century Danish philosopher, describes how easy it is for us to delude ourselves when it comes to this business of faith. “We wade out,” he says, “a little way from the shore, and then appear to onlookers to be swimming, risking the dangers of the depths. But all the time we're careful that our feet can still touch the bottom. It's all just a show.” 

And an awful lot of religious activity is exactly like that, isn't it? We can never find God that way. The search for the Christ must take place down on the road, where everything's at risk, down where we're called upon to accept personal responsibility for things, and where choices have to be made in the middle of the social and political conflicts of our world. The quietism of the balcony, the place of withdrawal, is not the way to Him. God redeems us as individuals, not in splendid isolation, but as we engage ourselves with the struggle for those freedoms that make redemption visible and meaningful in the world.

Dr Sheila Cassidy, an English GP, worked for four years in Chile during the time of the overthrow of Allende’s  government in 1973. They were among the most traumatic and brutal years in Chilean history. Sheila Cassidy found herself suddenly flung into another world, far removed from her middle-class suburban lifestyle, a world of terrible privation, where many children die in the first two years of life, and where in one hospital she soon discovered that the vast majority of her patients lived in wooden plank houses with earth floors, no running water, and a simple hole-in-the-ground lavatory.

In her autobiography, she writes, “It was while working in this hospital that I was first forced, like Thomas, to put my finger into the wound of Chile's poverty, and thus come like him to believe.” Later, when planning a trip home to see her father, a friend advised her to go by Miami and Bermuda. It's so beautiful, but don't go to Peru. The poverty is so depressing. But Sheila Cassidy had already discovered that the road of faith runs through the ugly parts of this world, as well as through the beautiful, and through the areas of hostility, as well as those of peace and quiet. 

And for us here in Northern Ireland, that means it cuts across our community divisions and sectarianism, and through the agonies of racism, oppression, exploitation and everything that dehumanises and alienates people throughout the earth. This is a Jerusalem to Jericho road where we meet robbers as well as good Samaritans. Suddenly the fairy tale atmosphere of the Magi begins to assume the harsh features of reality, doesn't it? This journey is fraught with hazards, and so in all kinds of subtle ways we are tempted back to the balcony, to the place of apparent safety and security above it all, and we miss as a result the salvation of God, for we refuse the journey that passes through the world, affirming rather than denying it.

To return to the music of Simon and Garfunkel again, for whom I must admit there's a special place, I think, in my heart, they've another song which catches this lure of the balcony perfectly. It pictures someone alone in a winter's night, hidden and insulated up in a bedroom, protected against the cold and life down on the street, untouched by the world, safe, but desperately lonely, frustrated, and going nowhere… 

“I am a rock, and a rock feels no pain, and an island never cries.”

Down on the road, however, the Magi weren't simply left to their own devices entirely. They were given a star to follow, something to look up to, a guide. Of course, it's easy to weave all sorts of allegorical and fanciful ideas around this appearance of a star, but then, as we've already said, there's really nothing all that strange or miraculous about it.

Countless travellers on land and sea have been guided by their lodestar for generations. We all need a star, a kindly light amid the encircling gloom, if you like, something that gives us direction. The search can't be carried out with any sense of conviction and hope without it.

When I was a child, I spent all my summer holidays, and any others I could manage, on the shores of the Ards Peninsula. My grandfather lived there, in the village of Cloughey, a fascinating old character, the sort of grandfather grandchildren idolise. He'd spent all his working days at sea, sometimes trafficking across the world on those magnificent old sailing ships; were he alive now, “The Onedin Line” would have been right up his street!

A lot of my time out of school was spent with him, pottering about in his boat, laying lobster creels, fishing, and now and again visiting the light ship permanently moored some miles out from our coastline. Occasionally, we'd spend most of the day with the crew, returning home in the evening when night had fallen. I remember one occasion in particular, when on the way home, darkness closed in around us, the wind rose, and the waves began to toss our little craft about like a cork.

I was beginning to get frightened, and while not daring to show it, my grandfather was somehow instinctively aware of it. He put one hand on my shoulder, and with the other hand he pointed ahead. “Look,” he said, “look, you can see all the lights of our bay yonder in the distance, and do you see that fourth light from the left, the one with the reddish glow? That's the light of our house, where we're headed. Now just you keep your eye fixed on that light.” It became my magi star, and I soon forgot all about the wind and the waves. I had, you see, a point of reference.

In our search for the Christ and the God who reveals Himself there, we've been given a point of reference. I suppose we've been given various lights, but I'm thinking about the Bible in particular, the Bible as our lodestar. How does the Psalmist describe it? Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.

Mind you, the Bible does seem to lead us into queer places at times, up all kinds of side tracks and cul-de-sacs. I'm sure it must be a constant source of puzzlement to non-Christians that there can be so many divergent denominations and sects, and all of them appealing to the same Bible to justify their differences. Of course, being human, we're bound to see things from different standpoints, and I can think of nothing worse than everyone reduced down to one common denominator.

You know how it goes in the song, we think alike, we look alike, we act alike. But at the same time, if the Bible really is a shared point of reference, then following it ought to bring us together on the journey rather than leading us apart. So it's got a lot to do with how we follow.

Our following then will depend very much on our ability to understand and interpret the Bible. I imagine there must have been lots of other people who saw the same star as the Magi all those centuries ago, but who failed to understand its significance. The Bible guides us insofar as we have the spirit to discern its true significance, and that means, among other things, allowing the Bible to be interpreted and understood within the shared ecumenical context of the whole church.

Lose sight of that, and we are soon off the road leading to Bethlehem, and onto a sectarian byway that invariably runs into the sand, or we're back up on the balcony. That doesn't mean the Bible doesn't speak to me directly as an individual. Of course it does, but as an individual whose pilgrimage is a shared understanding, experience, and growth towards maturity within the whole Christian community to which I belong.

Within the breadth and depth of this community, embedded in the world, the Bible lights the way to Christ, bears witness to Him. If I'm allowed to mix metaphors, in the words of Martin Luther, the Bible is the swaddling clothes in which the Christ child is wrapped. Here's a hymn that I think says it all fairly well, “Lord, Thy Word Abideth.”

So, they've set out, they've followed the star, and next thing we know the Magi are standing before Herod. Not surprising, perhaps, for it’s Jerusalem and the Royal Palace where they might have expected to find the object of their search. But Herod's palace is the last place where they're going to find this king. Herod, who was out to do him in, a possible rival to the throne. In the journey of the Magi, Herod represents a diversion. The Magi get sidetracked and end up in the wrong place.

James Plunkett, in his book on Irish places and history, “The Gems She Wore,” tells a harrowing story. There was a time during his life when he lived in an isolated cottage in Connemara. He had rented the cottage from a man who, as he puts it, had an air about him which set him apart.

One night, James Plunkett sat and listened to his story.

“He said that at one time long ago his father and mother and six brothers and sisters lived together in that small cottage and were happy. Then one by one the others went to America, and he was left alone with his father and mother.

Then his father died, then his mother. He was alone. At first, he used to lie awake and alone at nights and prayed to his father and mother to talk to him.

Nothing happened. He thought at first it was God who would not allow it, so he prayed to God to let one of them come to him just for one brief moment. He asked God to have pity on his great loneliness, but nothing happened.

Night after night he prayed, and night after night in the silence between his prayers he heard nothing, only the ticking of the clock and the creak of ash in the dying fire. Until one night it became so unendurable he rose again undressed. Something drew him to the graveyard.

He stood at the grave and entreated his mother and father to speak to him. Nothing happened, nothing stirred in the little graveyard, nothing at all. It was as he listened to the nothingness that made no response, no matter how hard he implored and begged and wept.

The thought for the first time came to him that there was nothing to beg from. He was talking to nothing. If God were there, he would have let his mother or father come.

If his father and mother were there, they would have come in spite of God, because they would have known how he was suffering, and they loved him before everything. He did not blame God. He was not there.

He did not blame his parents. They were not there either. In the graveyard that night he found out that beyond the little span of years granted to each man and woman, there was only silence and emptiness.

Instead of God and heaven, there was only absence and a void. 

That was the story he told me at his fireside in Connemara. He had worked it out long ago, he said, for right or for wrong, and it set him apart.

Greater than the lonely acres of bog and lake which surrounded him was the loneliness squeezed into the little space of his heart.” 

It's a tragic story, isn't it? Full of Irish melancholy. I must confess I can understand this kind of agnosticism, and I think sometimes we fail to appreciate its honesty, though I suspect there's a bit of it in all of us.

I know there certainly is in me, but the real tragedy for me is that somewhere along the way this lonely man got sidetracked. In his search for God, he was diverted and ended up in the wrong place. “Why do you seek the living among the dead?” And it's so easy to get off the road and wander down the dead ends of religious inwardness, or self-centred piety, or illusory holiness, of moribund laws and doctrines, to get sidetracked in the quest of God. So easy. 

However, the Magi were nothing if not dedicated to their search. So, they came at last to Bethlehem, to the place where the young child was, and entering the stable presented their gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

But it's about here that I begin to feel uneasy. It's this ipso facto happy ending. The Magi, finding the King, returned to Persia and lived happily ever after.

The search ended, the journey over, certainty secured, and everything rosy. But that doesn't ring true, does it? Life, the search, the Christian pilgrimage, human experience, just aren't like that. Follow through the story in St. Matthew, and scarcely have the Magi left Bethlehem than the town and region round about it is soaked in a bloodbath, when Herod, in his rage and determination to dispose of any possible contender, slaughters every male child under two years of age.

“A voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud lamentation, Rachel weeping for her children. She refused to be consoled, because they were no more.” 

No, it's not just a lovely story about going to Bethlehem and finding the Christ, and going away again, and everything is right. Nothing really changes, except that now there's a Christmas Tree in the corner of the room, and for a few days every year people are nice to one another. No, no, there's something revolutionary here, something we haven't really understood yet. How does the Gospel put it? “This child is for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and a sword, a sword will pierce your own soul also.”

That's why Eliot ends his poem, with which we began, as he does, and I have a feeling he's a lot nearer to the biblical meaning of this journey of the Magi, than perhaps a lot of our Christmas romance. 

“All this was a long time ago, I remember, and I would do it again, but set down this, set down this, where we led all that way for birth or death. There was a birth, certainly, we had evidence, and no doubt.

I had seen birth and death but had thought they were different. This birth was hard and bitter agony for us, like death, our death. We returned to our places, these kingdoms, but no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation, with an alien people clutching their gods.

I should be glad of another death.” 
I'm reminded of two other travellers at the very end of the Gospel story. They had set out too to search for the Christ, and for a short time they thought they'd found him, but it all seemed now a terrible, sick joke, for they'd seen all their hopes and beliefs nailed with him on a criminal's cross on the garbage dump outside Jerusalem.

Now they were on their way back home along the road to Emmaus, utterly dejected, a violent and bloody end this to everything, “Where we led all that way for death. Faith, you have made fools of us!” But as the evening dusk gathered, they became aware of another presence with them. The stranger began to explain to them the events of the past few days and offered an amazing interpretation of them within the light of the Old Testament. As the darkness deepened, so too the light increased. They began to understand something of the meaning of this crucifixion, and something about the person of this stranger who walked with them, until at last in their village home he broke with them, and they knew him to be Jesus.

Suddenly faith revealed it secret. This death was birth. This end was the beginning. Their search for the Christ ended to begin with this, the experience that the Christ had found them. The meaning of the journey then is that as we seek Him, we discover ourselves to be found by Him. We've been walking in His company all the time. He's on the road with us. 

To come through faith to see that is to find God. 

Blaise Pascal, that French genius, sums up this paradox of the seeker with words that spring from the centre of his own spiritual pilgrimage.

“Thou wouldst not seek me hadst thou not already found me.”

And now a prayer. 

“Our Father, we thank you that you have revealed yourself to us in Jesus Christ, your Son, so that we don't have to seek you as those who are without light, but rather as those for whom the light has shone into the darkness, and the darkness hasn't overcome it.

And we thank you that our search itself is an intimation of your presence with us. 

Son of our souls, abide with us throughout our lives until the light becomes greater and the shadows depart. 

Christ be with me, Christ within me, Christ behind me, Christ before me, Christ beside me, Christ to win me, Christ to comfort and restore me, Christ beneath me, Christ above me, Christ in quiet, Christ in danger, Christ in hearts of all that love me, Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

Amen.”



Friday, 18 April 2025

McMaster Street

Fragment of private, autobiographical recording by Rev R D Drysdale, remembering his childhood in East Belfast.



McMaster Street, Belfast

Testing, testing, one, two, three, testing, testing…

I grew up in East Belfast. Our house was in McMaster Street on the lower Newtownards Road, in the heart of Ballymacarrett.

We considered our street superior over the other streets around, because we had houses with attics. McMaster Street opens onto the main road, opposite St Patrick's Church of Ireland parish church. Our family, however, were Presbyterians, and had little contact with the big church at the end of our street.

We lived under the shadow of the shipyard gantries, now sadly gone with the decline in shipbuilding in Belfast. Almost every working man in the local area was employed in Harland and Wolff Shipyard, or the aircraft factory at Short Brothers in Harland. My father worked at Short’s, but being paid off seemed to hang like a cloud over the workforce in those days.

It was hardly surprising, because a worker in the yard or at the aircraft factory could be given their cards at a moment's notice. They could go out in the morning to their work and come home in the evening redundant. Workers had fewer rights in the 1940s and 50s than they do now.

At one end of our street was the Masonic Hall, still there today. As children we played football with goalposts chalked on the Masonic wall. Too often we missed a target and ended up putting the ball through a window.

The caretaker would emerge and send us scattering for home with dire threats of what he would do to us if he caught us playing there again. The next day we were back playing as usual. He never caught any of us. He had no chance against fleet-footed youngsters. 

Outside our house was a streetlight. As evening drew in, the lamplighter came along to light the gas mantle which gave a pale-yellow glow in the dark street. We had to dodge the lamplighter too, who threatened us with all sorts of punishments. The reason we also made an enemy of the lamplighter was because a favourite game was swinging on the lamp with a rope. This shook the lamp's standard and often broke the fragile glass mantle.


 


Advent Rev R D Drysdale (Personal Recording)

At home recording of a sermon on the theme of Advent. 

Rev R D Drysdale (Circa 1979)


Advent


Well, I don't know what it's like in your part of the world, but here in Northern Ireland it's spring, a marvellous, resilient, sappy time of year. For I live in Belfast. Along these streets and avenues, the cherry blossom trees are in full bloom and the gardens are coming alive again after the harder, colder days of winter.

Mind you, I don't feel quite as romantic and poetic about it all when the weekly chore of cutting the grass around my own house has to be done. Spring, alas, also has its drawbacks. 

The Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn tells a story that seems to me to capture this springtime miracle perfectly.

During a period of his life when he was exiled to a remote part of northern Russia, he together with others was set to felling trees and then chopping them up into logs. For a whole year some of the logs had lain out, exposed to the bitter, cold winter months. But come the Spring, when the men returned to saw the logs into smaller sizes, one elm log they discovered hadn't given up.

In fact, there was a fresh green shoot sprouting from it, a sign of survival, of hope and of promise, a whole new tree even in the making. The men placed the log on the sawing horse, but somehow even those tough and hardened prisoners couldn't bring themselves to cut into it. “How could we?” asked Solzhenitsyn. “That log cherished life as dearly as we did. Indeed, its urge to live was even greater than ours.”

Faith in God, it seems to me, is always a bit like that. It has to struggle for survival.

Faith in the sense of a providential care over our lives, a sense of knowing ourselves to be grasped and held by something which is not of ourselves, and which we also recognise to be for our good. Such faith in a world like ours isn't easy. It must struggle towards growth, like that tender shoot on the elm log.

It has to grow through many winters of doubt and the unanswered and unanswerable questions constantly being thrown up by our human experience, an experience which has to wrestle with the mysteries of life in this world, with man's inhumanity to man, with terminal diseases, with the yawning gap between rich and poor, with tragedies like Bhopal and the starving multitudes of North Africa, and with the unproven and unprovable existence of God in the middle of it all. But faith in God is the courage which says again and again, nevertheless, “I believe.” And without faith, struggling to grow within our souls, what have we? What are we? Physical husks, eating, sleeping, making love, working, competing, getting older, and dying at last, dust to dust.

Faith in a goodness, a divine love, at the heart of things is often, as Jesus described it, like a tiny seed struggling to grow, and yet capable of becoming a flower that splits the rock. For faith is the tender shoot born of the conviction that we are something more than just flesh and blood, that we're not just children of humanity, but children of God. 
At the heart of Advent then, as I've said, we come up against this great paradox, this apparent contradiction, the Creator revealing himself in an obscure birth, in a remote corner of this earth, at a place called Bethlehem.

The message is staggering. Little wonder our words fall apart when we try to describe it, or our minds just give out when we try to understand it. Yet it can grasp us, this thing that we can't grasp.

And so, for just a little while now, I want us to allow that to happen, to simply allow ourselves to be confronted and addressed by this supreme paradox, that in Jesus Christ we encounter both the God who remains hidden from us, and yet drawn near to us. So, let's hunt this paradox for a little while and see where it leads us. 

In Jesus Christ we meet with both the mystery of God and his accessibility.

If we had lived around Galilee all those years ago and had, let's say, followed Jesus down the street or along the lake shore, we'd have noticed nothing exceptional about him. Lots of people didn't. And if we'd ask someone, who's that man over there? Do you imagine anyone would have said, that's not a man, that's God.

And even if they had, would we have believed them? “Old Ezra is going astray in the head…” we'd be more likely to tell the next-door neighbour, “…he's beginning to hallucinate. Imagine that carpenter from Nazareth is God, I ask you!” And just to confirm our opinion about poor old Ezra's premature senility, if we managed to listen to Jesus himself, we'd hear him talking about God, and more in his prayers, we'd hear him talking to God, calling him, “Father.”

In Jesus' own awareness then, God was quite distinct and separate from himself. So that even when we look at Jesus close up, as it were, the mystery of God isn't removed. The enigmatic nature of God's presence in the world and His coming among us through the event of the Christ continues to puzzle us.

The mystery of God remains. Indeed, if anything, Advent simply serves to heighten it. And it's something I'm sure we should never lose sight of, so that our talk about God should never become too flippant, too casual, too matter of fact.

Christian faith, with its symbols and rituals, reminds us of this, that sometimes we need to be still and just acknowledge that we've nothing to say, no light to cast on the mystery, no way of resolving the paradox. In this sense, it's always Advent. God is always coming.

We can't speak unreservedly of an open arrival. The trouble is that we live in an age that much of the time can't abide mystery. The spirit of our generation is one that wants everything exposed, laid open to view, the public view. The cameras are everywhere. It's a profane age. Too often it takes the sacred and the mysterious and profanes it. Self-assertion is the spirit of our time. We've all but lost what it is to be reticent. So, the very name Christ is on many people's lips a profanity rather than an expression of mystery. We vulgarise the very things we ought to reverence. We try to reduce religion down to our secularised values, down to what we can handle, turning the mystery of God into a superstar. And slowly, imperceptibly, we remove the voice of angels from the Christian message, or at least we remove from our lifestyle the capacity to hear it.

Yet the truth is that without this dimension of the beyond and the inexplicable, we can't even begin to hear the Advent message for what it is, the message that preserves the mystery of God. “Take the shoes off your feet,” the Divine Presence ordered Moses, “for you are standing on holy ground.” Advent is a salutary reminder in an age of hobnailed boots that there are times when we ought to tread slowly, softly.

There is however, as I've suggested, the other side of Advent, the other part of the paradox, that in Jesus Christ we not only encounter the mystery of God, but also the accessibility of God. Had we continued to follow Jesus down the street or along the lakeshore, to revert to our earlier flight of imagination, we'd have been aware of something else, as well as His ordinary humanness. We'd have been struck by His authority.

We'd have felt, as others apparently did, that here was someone who spoke not as man speaks. We'd have been forced to wonder at the things He did, the lame made to walk, the blind to see, lepers cleansed, and people crippled in spirit by sin and guilt set free, gloriously free. And when it was all over and He'd been crucified, and yet His presence remained still with those who were his disciples, so that they confessed Him as their risen Lord, and more than that, went out in the power of His presence with them and turned the world upside down, in the light of all this, we'd either have to dismiss it all as some kind of hocus-pocus, or lift our eyes away from all these strange events running back from an empty tomb in Jerusalem to a stable manger in Bethlehem, to lift up our eyes and see God.

See God behind the authority of this Nazarene carpenter. God so at work in this man Jesus, and Jesus so identified with God, that His will and that of His father's were one to the point that we could say, as the New Testament does, God was in Christ. And then we'd begin to understand how Jesus, with what would appear as arrogance in anyone else, could say of himself, “He who has seen me has seen the Father.”

God making himself accessible to us in Jesus. God drawn near to us. God with a human face.

And that really matters, doesn't it? To know in our own experience that God is down with us in the nitty-gritty of things here, in the small and inconsequential things of our lives, as well as in the big issues of world affairs and human history. It matters desperately to know that God's accessible when we're locked up in a sick room gasping for breath, or when our heart takes wings and we've just got to know who to thank, or when our child prays this Christmas and asks for the BMX bicycle. It matters.

In fact, religion is empty unless it brings into my little world the God of the universe, who's also smaller than the galaxies. When Emerson, the writer, was asked the secret of his life, he replied simply, “I had a friend.” It's really not enough to believe in God, maker of Heaven and Earth, unless we can also penetrate this mystery of creation and find a friend, one to whom we can pray and say, “Our Father…”

To live then in the light of this Advent paradox, to be grasped by it, to be religious in this the true sense of being religious, to live in the tension between this mystery and this accessibility of God will profoundly affect how we live, how we understand this world and our way through it. It means that we live humbly, sharing the same perplexities and inarticulate answers and this silence that everyone else finds before the mysteries of being human and not Supermen, and therefore before the infinite mystery we call God. And yet it will also mean that we live confidently, finding God nearer to us at times than we could dare imagine, and so in his accessibility proving himself to be there, the greatest certainty in all the world.









Interpreting the Times: Rock Bottom (1979)

  

First broadcast: Sun 9th Sept 1979, 11:30 on BBC Radio 2

with THE REV DEREK DRYSDALE


The third of three broadcasts on the theme
Interpreting the Times: Rock Bottom


Music: 
Send In The Clowns / Lena Martell
Bright Eyes / Art Garfunkel
There's a Man Going 'Round Taking Names / Paul Robeson
Is That All There Is? / Peggy Lee
            
    
Contributors:
Mark Mulholland 
                         
Producer: 
Ernie Rea 

© BBC RADIO/BBC Northern Ireland




Interpreting the Times: It's My Life (1979)

 

First broadcast: Sun 2nd Sept 1979, 11:30 on BBC Radio 2

with THE REV DEREK DRYSDALE


The second of three broadcasts on the theme
Interpreting the Times: It's My Life/"Feelin' Free"


Music: 
My Life / Billy Joel
Me And You And A Dog Named Boo / Lobo
Freedom / Love Song
Bind Us Together, Lord / Unknown
God Be In My Head / Unknown
  
Contributors:   
Mark Mulholland 
Rev Ray Davey 

Producer: 
Ernie Rea 

© BBC RADIO/BBC Northern Ireland




Interpreting the Times: The Times They are a-Changin'
(1979)

First broadcast: Sun 26th Aug 1979, 11:30 on BBC Radio 2

with THE REV DEREK DRYSDALE


The first of three broadcasts on the theme
Interpreting the Times
1: The Times They are a-Changin'



Music: The Times They Are A-Changin’         Bob Dylan
    Just An Old-Fashioned Girl         Eartha Kitt & Henri René
            When The Stars Begin To Fall         The Seekers
            I'm Pressing On the Upward Way/Higher Ground Unknown


Contributors: Jayne Adair
                        Mark Mulholland 

Producer: Ernie Rea 

© BBC RADIO/BBC Northern Ireland





Sunday, 13 April 2025

Belmont Presbyterian Church (1980)

 

Rev R D Drysdale 

30th March 1980

Belmont Presbyterian Church, Belfast.


Palm Sunday

Introduction

Hymn “All Glory, Laud and Honour”


Prayer / The Lord’s Prayer


New Testament Reading: Matthew c21 v1-9 Luke c19 v41&42


Hymn (Psalm 118) “Oh Set Ye Open Unto Me The Gates of Righteousness”


New Testament Reading: Mark c15v 21-39 


Anthem “Oh Living Will” (Stanford)


Prayer


Hymn “We Sing The Praise of Him Who Died”


Sermon “Palm Sunday”


Just above this church lie the Holywood Hills. There's a road that snakes its way up through them towards Bangor. At the top you get an arresting view of Belfast, lying sprawled out in the Lagan basin.


If you come on it at night driving towards the city, as I've often done, it's hard to resist the urge to pull the car into the side of the road and sit for a few minutes contemplating the twinkling lights below. There it lies, Belfast. What hopes, dreams and new terrors are being hatched down there in the darkness? Mind you, you won't be alone for long, for it's also a favourite spot on dark nights for courting couples, though needless to say they have other reasons for parking halfway into the ditch than the twinkling lights of Belfast.


But day or night, when you've time to stop and look without feeling you're intruding, from up there the city can hold a kind of magical and almost melancholy spell over you. It must have been something like that that pulled Jesus up short on that memorable day long ago, when topping the Mount of Olives, Jerusalem suddenly came into view lying below Him; And looking down at it he wept. 


“Oh Jerusalem, would that even today you knew the things that make for peace, but now they are hidden from your eyes.”


And there we have it, the supreme moment of irony, the contradiction within the heart of what we now call Palm Sunday. Everywhere the crowds jubilant and Jesus weeping. Jesus riding into Jerusalem and he knew even if the crowds didn't, what was waiting for him down there.


And all the palm branch waving and popular acclaim only served to heighten the real significance of Jesus' entry into the holy city. The backdrop of this scenario is death. Casting a shadow over it all is the Cross.


That's why I can't help feeling, you know, that often we get Palm Sunday all wrong in our churches, turning it into a kind of carnival, the religious season for making whoopee. But when we try to understand this incident in the context of Christ's passion, there's really nothing festive about it. Admittedly, Jesus did nothing to try and stop the adoring multitudes. And in fact, he rebuked the Pharisees when they tried to dampen the disciples' enthusiasm. “I tell you, if these were quiet, the very stones would cry out.” But even so, the irony is there. Right at the very centre of this apparent triumph, it's there. And it comes out nowhere more poignantly perhaps than that moment when at the very height of the public reception, Jesus suddenly stops and weeps. 


We who live in Northern Ireland should understand this irony of Palm Sunday better than most. For it's often been in our moments of apparent normality and even festivity that death has suddenly exploded into our midst. Who can forget La Mon? Our generation lives with the ubiquitous image of death. On our streets, we're all too familiar with the blanketed figure lying by the roadside or on the pavement viewed from a distance through the camera lens.


And not just here at home, but across our world, the grey spectre of public death has returned again and again to haunt us in our troubled times, giving us uneasy dreams. Our modern era has undoubtedly experienced a sharpened awareness of death. 

When an American TV reporter was recently killed in Nicaragua by a soldier nonchalantly raising his rifle and shooting him dead, we all sat and watched the incident brought into our living rooms by courtesy of television.


And a survey published some weeks back in the United States estimated that the average teenager will have watched about 18,000 murders enacted on TV programmes and films by the time he's 18. But there's a strange irony in all of this today too. Familiar with the public spectacle of death as we are, we're also apparently less able to cope with it than former generations, or even talk about it. It's our taboo subject. So much so that universities and colleges in the States have now introduced a new subject into their courses of education. “Thanatology,” they call it. The study of death. And books and articles roll off the presses in an attempt to meet the increasing demand for help in facing death, coping with death's legacy of bereavement, and meeting the harsh realities of terminal illnesses. And I know that as a minister, I'm struck at times by some funeral arrangements that often go to enormous lengths to try and hide the reality of death behind the burial or cremation rites.


Again, in the States, they've a phrase that sums it up exactly. They call it “beautifying the remains.” It's like waving palm branches in the face of the cross.


And it's here in this irony that I believe we touch the hidden root of so much of our contemporary anxiety, fear, and obsessions that accompany every reminder of death. The fact is that many of us today encounter the presence of death in the absence of God. Deep down in the heart of our Western societies, deep down in the soul of many of us who find ourselves trapped and shorn by current values, lifestyles, and secular materialism, deep down there, we stand before death without God.


As a contemporary writer puts it, “…the philosophy of this generation is that death waits for us as a cement floor waits for a dropping light bulb.” And so, before this cement floor, we crumble into neuroses of all kinds and try to hide if we can from the terrifying reality of the end, putting a festive mask on it, pushing it to a distance from us where it ceases to be a visible threat, until Holy Week reminds us about what we prefer to forget, where another victim lies bleeding, mangled on the wheel of our violent times, and then we stand again in the unavoidable presence of death as the enemy, the threat.


The Cross once more is centred in our modern world, and suddenly it's Palm Sunday all over again. 


It was, I think, in Auschwitz that a prisoner of the last war watched lorry loads of Jews taken every day to the gas chambers. The cries of the naked victims, often screaming for mercy, wouldn't leave him day or night. He prayed to God that if he existed, he must surely see all this suffering and put an end to it. But day after day, it went on. At last, sore and weary with prayer, he gave up. There could be no God. He was left with death in the absence of God. But when we turn to the New Testament, when we move, in fact, through Holy Week towards Easter, the whole scene changes.


We enter a different world. It's the world of faith, where death is encountered in the presence of God. And if it's true, if He's present, even when the Cross is set up in our own experience, if it's true, then all's changed, changed utterly.


There's a point in one of his letters, his first letter to the Corinthians, where the Apostle Paul, writing about death as man's last enemy, seems to stop in his tracks, gather himself together, and then goes on to say, in effect, that what death means for each of us depends upon how we meet it, in the absence or in the presence of God. And so, Paul is led directly into the meaning of the Cross and the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Death, every death, horrendous or natural, in war or peace, every death that confronts us outside the victory of Christ is the enemy, the destroyer, the foe that brings us to nothing.


We end it all like the light bulb smashing on the floor. But, and here's the crescendo of Paul's argument, indeed of his own experience of God, but if it be that God raised up Jesus Christ from the dead, then there's more to be said. Death is not the end, not necessarily the enemy, for the resurrection of Jesus must mean that “death has been swallowed up in victory,” to use Paul's own phrase.


Here, then, we touch on one of the subterranean truths of Christian faith, that there is nothing that can be ultimately against us, not even death, if God is in it. And what does holy week mean if it doesn't mean this? That in all our suffering and death, God is there. Even when, like Jesus himself, we cry out in the night, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” The cry of Auschwitz.


For in that moment, Jesus knew the pain of those lorry loads of naked people driven to their extermination, and the anguish of that prisoner who saw it all and felt God couldn't be there. Every dark night of the soul in a nation's life, or an individual's experience, is the same cry of dereliction that Jesus articulated on the cross, and that made him stop that day above Jerusalem and weep. 


But God was in it. He was there, and he was not silent. For beyond the blackness of the Cross, another cry was to be heard. He is risen.


In Rolf Hochhuth's play, The Deputy, set in a concentration camp in Nazi Germany, one of the scenes portrays a confrontation between the vicious camp doctor and one of the prisoners, a priest called Ricardo. The doctor is responsible for the assignment of prisoners, either for extermination or hideous medical experiments. In Ricardo, however, he finds someone whose faith in God troubles him. The priest has a disturbing influence on him, jagging whatever remains of the doctor's conscience. So, the doctor sets out to break him and to make him betray his faith, and admit that everything has to be faced without God. 


“Look,” says the doctor, “look around you. Since July 1942, for 15 months, weekdays and sabbaths, I've been sending people to God. And do you think he's made the slightest acknowledgement? He has not even directed a bolt of lightning against me.” And then sneeringly, he adds, “9,000 people in one day a while back, puffing up the chimney.”


And so the doctor goes on, promising Ricardo freedom if he'll throw in his luck with the camp authorities, and luring him with physical pleasures if only he'll acknowledge that when we die, we die without God. At last, unable to take any more, Ricardo brings to an end the doctor's unrelenting attack, and at the same time, pronounces the death sentence on himself. As in defiance, he shouts at him, 

“Your, your hideous face, composed of lust and filth and gibberish, sweeps all doubts away! All. Since the Devil exists, God also exists. Otherwise, you and the Devil would have won a long time ago.”


When on this Palm Sunday and living through our own community passion in our brutalised Ulster society, we can stand with Ricardo and say that, then we've been led through the Cross to resurrection, through death to life. We've been led beyond Palm Sunday and its terrible irony to Easter, alive with hope. Only then can we really wave the palm branches.


The pilgrimage of Holy Week is the invitation to make this great discovery of faith for ourselves. 


Death, Swallowed up in victory.


And may the words of my mouth and the meditation of all our hearts be acceptable in your sight, our Lord and our Redeemer.


Hymn “Ride On Ride On In Majesty”

McQuiston Memorial Presbyterian Church (1979)

 

Rev R D Drysdale 

28th September 1979

McQuiston Memorial Presbyterian Church, Belfast.



Announcing decision to leave McQuiston


As you will all no doubt have heard by now, last Tuesday night I returned home after the Kirk Session meeting and learnt of the call by Belmont Church, a call which I have accepted, subject to Presbytery approval at their next meeting. I can only hope that you understand when I tell you that this is one of the most difficult moments in my life. To stand here and tell you that, after a relatively short ministry, I am now leaving you and I can only hope that those of you who feel most deeply hurt, disappointed, and let down by my decision will be able to find it in your heart to forgive me.

You have every right to ask me why. I don't imagine for a moment that I can answer that question to your complete satisfaction, but I owe it to you to try, even if only in the broadest and most general terms. 

Let me begin by making clear that while we have had several difficult winters here since coming in 1976, that is not why I'm prepared to leave.

Indeed the problems that we've had to face and the battles that have had to be fought seem to me at this point in time to have had an overall healthy result, though the tensions and the strains on personal relationships have left their scars. But in so many ways the church here has emerged stronger and a new spirit of freedom among many is clearly evident. Indeed at this moment in time I feel, rightly or wrongly, that McQuiston has never been more united and in better heart since my coming here than it is now.

So I'm leaving, it would seem, just when I would appear to be beginning to enjoy some of the fruits of the past three and a half years' hard work. Very hard work. Why then am I prepared to go? 

Well let me fill in the background to this Belmont call, which may hopefully help to provide something of an answer. Developments which obviously now I am at a liberty to disclose to you, and only now. However secretive I may have seemed, I had no alternative over these past weeks and months.

Over the past couple of years, and especially last winter, like it or not, I found myself with a feeling growing inside me that my style and emphases of ministry were perhaps not the ones best suited to the needs and character of McQuiston. We are all what we are, and this increasing awareness within me is much more an honest acknowledgement of my limitations than any criticism of McQuiston. But the plain fact is that I've not been at one with myself, or attaining the level of fulfilment that for me is at the heart of what makes me tick.

I recognise that I'm essentially a reflective person. McQuiston needs someone who is above all else an activist, an organiser, a go-getter, for in some ways I suppose the kind of role demanded here is that akin to a church extension ministry, for the great belt of nominal membership here is enormous. But for me, not to be able to have time to browse, to think through the deeper aspects of the Christian life in today's society, to engage in meaningful action across the narrow parochial boundaries of denominationalism, to ponder the realities and goals underneath and behind all the hectic busyness, without this kind of dimension to my experience, I lose my creativity, my sense of priorities, and so easily become lost in terms of what the church and ministry are all about.

Others, I realise very well, others whose temperaments are different from mine, don't have this same sense of need, this relentless questioning. Their strengths lie in other directions than mine, and directions which on balance are probably more suited to the nature of the work here. I also need time to cultivate deep and meaningful pastoral relationships, my own limitation again, because I relate to people slowly.

It takes time to get to know me, as you must have discovered, and for me to get to know others, and with our numbers that's a luxury we can't afford. Yet superficial relationships I find very frustrating. I don't and can't wear my heart on my sleeve, so the question would not leave me. Would a different thrust of ministry be better adjusted to the situation here than mine? And apart from me altogether, would that be for the betterment of McQuiston? 

Again, I am what I am. 

But over against all of this, at the same time, Hilary and I have been coming to appreciate and to value more and more the many fine and dedicated people that we have here. The sort of members churches would give their right arms to have, if churches have right arms... People whom we have come to trust and to love dearly, and whose fellowship and kindness we have enjoyed more and more. Our great sorrow is the terrible hurt we are inflicting on you; people who least deserve it.

But in the middle of all these conflicting feelings, and we often spent long hours into the night talking them through, in the middle of such conflicting feelings, at the beginning of this year, first one and then a second church approached me about considering a move. Approaches, I might add, completely out of the blue and unsolicited by me. In both cases, I said no.

Then towards the summer, I was approached by Belmont Church. What was I to do? Go on saying no, or allow my name to be considered. And in all honesty, in the case of Belmont, where we have often worshipped on holiday Sundays when at home, I found it impossible to reject the possibility outright.

There come crucial moments, critical points in all our lives, when we know we cannot let the possibilities contained in such times pass without serious consideration. Such a moment for me was this approach from Belmont. And where in all of this was God's hand? And what was being said to me? I decided to give myself time to consider the matter and to pray about it.

I immediately informed our Clerk of Session, Mr. Bell, about the approach that had been made and the dilemma I now found myself in. A dilemma only I could resolve. This was shortly before we went on holiday.

On returning from holiday, I agreed to allow my name to go forward and to let things run their course. How else could I gain any sense of guidance? I again informed Mr. Bell of my decision. Belmont accordingly shortlisted my name together with others. The Hearing Committee heard us, met with us, and the eventual outcome was the call issued to me four days ago. 

Throughout this very difficult period, and only Hilary and I know the full agony of it all, Mr. Bell, together with Mr. Knox and Miss Orr, have been our trusted confidants, whose understanding and compassion we have greatly appreciated. And at this point, let me also add that Belmont have had their agony too in all of this, as was made very clear when we met the Hearing Committee. They have been very aware of the morality involved in approaching a minister from a neighbouring church, and after only three and a half years. And in fairness to them, I think that should be said, for they have had to bear their dilemma too. But then every call, to a greater or less degree, contains this element within it, one congregation's sense of loss.

But in the end of the day, it's the minister himself who makes the final decision if a call is tabled. And he who above all must be prepared to shoulder the burden of misunderstanding, resentment, and hurt that his decision and his alone has created. This is his loneliness, and it has to be borne.

If life were less complicated and made up of neat black and white situations, then answers and responses would be basically simple. But life is not like that much of the time. We thread our way through a maze, with God's help, but recognising if we think about it at all, that few decisions are ever wholly right without also some element of wrong.

So we walk by faith, and especially at the critical junctures of our lives, we step out always into the unknown. And of course, throughout all of this, we have wrestled with the question, "Where is God in all of this? What is His will?" 

I have never found the confidence of those who can say with great assurance, this is God's will for me. Too often it seems to me a subtle way of opting out of accepting responsibility for our own actions.

Of this decision, therefore, I can only say, I believe this is God's will for me. And that circumstances seem to have so arranged themselves as to make this belief credible for me. Guidance, almost always it seems to me, is discernible only in retrospect. At least that is as much as my personal experience will allow me to say. But I believe God honours responsible action. To act responsibly, as responsibly and as honourably as one can, is to act and decide within the perimeters of God's will. And within those perimeters, all things work together for good to them that love Him. What does the agony of Gethsemane mean if it doesn't mean that? 

That's why I read those profound words from Paul's letter to the Romans earlier. There for me lies the essence of what we mean by "Providence." That there is nothing that can ultimately separate us from the love of God. "Nothing in heaven or on earth, neither height nor depth, things present and things to come." Providence for me, and I think from what I read in Paul's letters especially, does not mean that life is planned and predetermined for us in advance, and that guidance is getting into the right rut that enables this plan to unfold itself like an automatic machine.

No, faith in Providence is rather the conviction, confirmed by Christian experience, that because there is God, there is therefore a creative and saving possibility in every situation. Nothing can separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus, our Lord. There is nothing therefore that need prevent any of us from fulfilling the meaning of our existence.

To believe and trust that, is to know that in this sense there is a will of God for us, and that it cannot finally be thwarted if we lay ourselves open to it, and are prepared to take responsibility for what we do. Let that conviction lie at the heart of this moment that we share together, how differently we may view it. Let this conviction lie at the heart of this moment, and we will come to see that the Kingdom of God and the Church's mission is bigger than any of us and that in all our decision making we merely move within a space larger than we can imagine and whose boundaries we haven't drawn. Sufficient for us to know that nothing can separate us from God's love, and then, for right or wrong, to decide and act.

And now having said all that, and in an attempt to draw to a conclusion, let me now perhaps in lighter vein remind you all of this, and lest everything seem so far too melodramatic by half, that it isn't after all the end of the world. I'm too long in church life now to not to realise, even if you've forgotten, that every congregation has a great resilience, and in the final farewell will say, "The King is dead, long live the King!" and set about finding a successor. And let's be honest, there's even a certain sense of adventure and tingle of excitement about the prospect of getting a new man, once you've got past the Union Commission, that forbidding body and church house that must first give permission to proceed, but then we've now got friends in high places, for Miss Orr is a member of that august body!

The initial shock over, you, I know, will very quickly start forgetting today, and setting your sights on tomorrow. 

And let me finish with this. What eases my mind considerably is not just the heart and state of the congregation as it is at this moment, but also to know that in Mr. Knox I'm leaving you in hands well able to cope, hands every bit as capable of mine, if not more so, that I'm leaving you with him. That also, of course, is part of our agony, for we and our wives have enjoyed the happiest possible relationship, but I'm leaving you in good hands, and he's younger too! So what more could you want? 

Finally, let me say that we won't stand upon our going, but we'll be here for some time yet, and no doubt we'll have ample opportunity to share further with you our feelings and our hopes, as we and you face together whatever lies before us. Assured of this, "That neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities, nor powers nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." 

And may he abundantly bless you all in weeks and months and years to come. 

Let us pray.















Evening Reception for the Retirement of Rev R D Drysdale (2004)

  CLICK HERE FOR RECORDING 29th February 2004 Belmont Presbyterian Church Speakers: Associate Minister Rev David Gray, (Belmont Presbyterian...